<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speculative realism in Bristol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthem-group.net/2009/04/14/speculative-realism-in-bristol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthem-group.net/2009/04/14/speculative-realism-in-bristol/</link>
	<description>The Actor-Network Theory - Heidegger Meeting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:18:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANTHEM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bruno Latour as Rush Limbaugh</title>
		<link>http://anthem-group.net/2009/04/14/speculative-realism-in-bristol/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ANTHEM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bruno Latour as Rush Limbaugh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthem-group.net/?p=650#comment-116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] work. First there was the Latour-Sloterdijk comics series by KLAUS from Harvard. Then there was the hilarious album cover for the speculative realists by Mike Watson from Goldsmiths. And now here is a &#8216;Bruno Latour [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] work. First there was the Latour-Sloterdijk comics series by KLAUS from Harvard. Then there was the hilarious album cover for the speculative realists by Mike Watson from Goldsmiths. And now here is a &#8216;Bruno Latour [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANTHEM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speculative commentaries</title>
		<link>http://anthem-group.net/2009/04/14/speculative-realism-in-bristol/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ANTHEM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speculative commentaries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthem-group.net/?p=650#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are a couple of reports from the recent Speculative Realism workshop in Bristol: one by Ben Woodard and another one by Andrew Osborne. Levi Bryant also has a nice post [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are a couple of reports from the recent Speculative Realism workshop in Bristol: one by Ben Woodard and another one by Andrew Osborne. Levi Bryant also has a nice post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://anthem-group.net/2009/04/14/speculative-realism-in-bristol/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthem-group.net/?p=650#comment-117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was me, yes, but really, well IT WAS YOU GUYS!!!
And testimony, if anything, to the centrality of marketing, viral marketing, etc, in promoting philosophy today (and I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve promoted more than besmirched you all): If no viable alternative to an object based philosophy is found, then it might well be as the old guard are not internet savvy enough to take on SR, not because they don&#039;t have the ideas.
One thinks of Nathan Brown&#039;s response to Hallward, which would probably take an inordinate amount of time to get a print response in turn, in Radical Philosophy - so long, in fact, that in blogosphere terms, it would be not entirely relevant.
Well, this one man band (pic soon) will take his web writing and media writing experience and mount his own response to SR (or, the worst excesses; what is good can stay!).
In good humour ! LR]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was me, yes, but really, well IT WAS YOU GUYS!!!<br />
And testimony, if anything, to the centrality of marketing, viral marketing, etc, in promoting philosophy today (and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve promoted more than besmirched you all): If no viable alternative to an object based philosophy is found, then it might well be as the old guard are not internet savvy enough to take on SR, not because they don&#8217;t have the ideas.<br />
One thinks of Nathan Brown&#8217;s response to Hallward, which would probably take an inordinate amount of time to get a print response in turn, in Radical Philosophy &#8211; so long, in fact, that in blogosphere terms, it would be not entirely relevant.<br />
Well, this one man band (pic soon) will take his web writing and media writing experience and mount his own response to SR (or, the worst excesses; what is good can stay!).<br />
In good humour ! LR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speculative Realism album &#171; Object-Oriented Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://anthem-group.net/2009/04/14/speculative-realism-in-bristol/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Speculative Realism album &#171; Object-Oriented Philosophy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthem-group.net/?p=650#comment-114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] HERE&#8217;S A LINK before the photo itself. I think I&#8217;d give Ray the prize in this one.      Posted by doctorzamalek Filed in Uncategorized   No Comments &#187; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HERE&#8217;S A LINK before the photo itself. I think I&#8217;d give Ray the prize in this one.      Posted by doctorzamalek Filed in Uncategorized   No Comments &#187; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

