No diatribe against his former tribe, but still, Harman at his heretic best.
Here’s a thought… What happens when Heidegger the tool breaks down?
Or the reverse, when Heidegger the tool withdraws into the tapestry of philosophy?
What is Harman doing when he is breaking Heidegger?
Advertisement
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
This entry was posted on 16 July 2009 at 11:22 pm and is filed under Graham Harman, Martin Heidegger, Object-oriented philosophy, philosophy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
17 July 2009 at 2:47 pm |
This is what the Abbau is all about. I think Harman has done it just right; incorporating the best of Heidegger and developing it for the contemporary age. We are too far from Heidegger to remain exactly in the limits of his own tool analysis.
20 July 2009 at 3:27 am |
Here Harman is consistently applying his object-oriented metaphysics. The disagreement with Heidegger here is so fundamental, so glaring, that it is of the type one can only have with a loved one.